Whining? I actually thought it was a case of support for a man who was innocent until proven guilty.

What does this prove other than that regardless of what happened or what the verdict is, that this man's reputation and standing in the community has been tainted, and that he no longer desires to be a part of it? I know that I sure wouldn't.

Whining Zach, hardly. I think it was more a conversation amongst folks, voicing opinions and support for a human being, who may or may not have done something illegal.. We have only been presented with one side of the case. Let's wait to hear both sides of the case before we tar, feather and hang this human being and friend to many. Who in the totality of his career, did many good things, but will forever be changed by this particular incident

People are human beings. It's very easy to gossip about others when something he or she did was less than ethical. Mr. Greening was involved with the school for about 15 years. We can all do things that are unethical; some people have the luxery of not being in the public eye and so, certain choices may go unnoticed. Sadly, this news came about, but it is important to remember, no charges have been pressed. This article is just about his resignation. Remember, those who judge are really judging themselves. My thoughts are with the community, including Mr. Greening, at this time.

Roya Oak has lost a fine administrator, one deeply loved and respected by his students and staff. Unfortunately, the damage that has been done to his reputation will do long lasting damage to a man who gave so much of himself to the district.
He will be sadly missed. Don

Judy Davis just personally told me she did not write this article and yet her name is under the title claiming she wrote it...can you say irresponsible journalism?

Emily, Judy did all the reporting on the story and I put together the pieces from the superintendent's statement, the reaction quotes and previously reported information. That is common practice.

Well your practice is irresponsible.

Maybe you're name should have been next to it aswell, I called judy because this article disgusted me...you need to claim responsibility too Beth

I'm curious, Emily, about why this article disgusted you. Most of it is merely repeating news that's already been reported in The Patch and other news outlets. Are you disgusted by the fact the principal may have stolen money that students, parents, and teachers worked hard to raise? I'm guessing not. We'll see what happens tomorrow when he appears in court, but it was inevitable that Mr. Greening resign. Suppose he IS innocent of the charges and is being railroaded for something he didn't do. Why would he want to go back to work for the district after the way he's been treated? Or perhaps he did what he's been accused of. I believe he should have resigned months ago, but held off until the end of the fiscal year in order to receive his full wages and benefits. Whatever the outcome, it's best for everyone, including and maybe especially Mr. Greening, that he resign.

I cannot think that any sort of blame needs to fall to the Royal Oak Patch for their reporting. Yes, I can recognize why a person would be upset about their principal's resignation, but to respond with a tasteless attack on the reporters accomplishes nothing for anybody.

They should of worded it better...he has not stole money nothing has been proved...he court date has yet to come..they should of said allegedly..that's it.

I also don't respect the fact you keep not letting me sign in...that's rude

Zach, you just look foolish with your "told you so" mentality. I don't know what you get out of that.

I'm definitely not a Greeningite, but I'm willing to wait to hear his side of the story - if he's willing to tell it. I would recommend withholding one's indignation towards the reporters and the naysayers until we hear the rest of the story - unless of course, you enjoy eating humble pie.

Just because the buck stops with Greening doesn't mean Greening took the bucks ... again people forget innocent until "proven" guilty. And God knows no one has EVER been falsely accused or not been able to supply adequate proof to completely remove doubt amongst all people.

Would an innocent man resign?

Truthfully, if I were innocent, I'd dig in and fight. I'd stay on paid leave as long as possible. If I was bitter over how I was treated, I might consider resigning after I was acquitted. Looks like they're angling for a deal.

This happens everyday and in much higher positions of responsibility. How can an intelligent man even think he could get away with this comes to mind. His life is ruined even if he were to walk free right now. Don't be too harsh in judgement he has already payed the highest price in humiliation for his alleged crime. Though the court is still out a resignation is usually the first step towards a full confession.
Along with any position of authority from Royal Oak to the White House there comes at one time or another the temptation to abuse it.