patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Proposal for Water Playground Goes Before Rehabilitation Board of Appeals

A proposal for a splash pad at Grant Park is on the agenda at City Hall tonight.

 

A group of residents is hoping its idea for water recreation park in Royal Oak makes a splash with city officials tonight.

The Rehabilitation Board of Appeals will consider Volunteer Royal Oak’s proposal for a water playground — or so-called splash pad — at Grant Park.

The nonprofit group thinks its proposal for a play area with a rain deck, water cannons, water geysers and spraying nozzles will be buckets of fun for residents. The proposal already has the unanimous approval of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, which saw a presentation on the water playground in November.

“I saw the plan and I think it’s great,” said City Commissioner Mike Fournier,  a member of the Parks and Recreation board. “It’s very family friendly.”

Royal Oak residents have been asking for some sort of aquatic center for years, Fournier said. “It’s a part of our Parks and Rec Master Plan,” he said.

The estimated price tag of a splash pad is $450,000-$550,000, including design and engineering fees, according to the proposal.

Fournier appreciates how Volunteer Royal Oak is thinking outside of the box. The splash pad would be paid for and maintained through federal grants, sponsorships and volunteer efforts.

“The important thing for everyone to understand is that we're trying to finance this whole thing through a Community Development Block Grant through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)," said Jay Dunstan, a member of Volunteer Royal Oak. “This project would not be possible otherwise, because frankly there are no Royal Oak monies available for anything like this.”

The grant money is available for urban development. “It’s important for residents to know this money is not available for public safety," Fournier said. "We are not trading cops for a splash pad.”

Wave of opinion

In a poll of Patch readers Friday, 90 percent of the respondents said yes to the idea of the splash pad while 5 percent said no and another 5 percent had no opinion.

On Facebook people had this to say:

  • Dan Calabrese: Splash pads are fun, especially in a community with so many families.
  • Sharon Markhoff: It's about time! Unfortunately my kids are older now, but there are so many families in Royal Oak that will enjoy this! Hope it really happens!
  • Kristin Farlow Ryan: I said YEARS ago that Royal Oak should have a community pool in one of our dozens of parks. Even though this isn't a pool it is something.
  • Gay Emily Thacker: Oh, please, please! Love the idea!

'Show up for the meeting'

“Since this became public, the reaction has been both positive and overwhelming,” said Dunstan, who will be making the presentation to the board on the behalf of Volunteer Royal Oak.

“I'm urging anybody who'd like to see this project move forward to show up for the meeting,” he said. “I knew this was a good proposition, but I wasn't prepared for the response. Apparently the wish for an aquatic facility, as expressed by residents in the Master Plan, needs to be taken very seriously.”

The Rehabilitation Board of Appeals meets at 7 tonight in Room 309 of City Hall.

  • Do you want to see a splash pad at Grant Park?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        203 (87%)
    • No
        19 (8%)
    • I don't care, I won't use it
        11 (4%)
    Total votes: 233
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Grant Park, Volunteer Royal Oak, Water Playground, aquatic park, and splash pad
Do you plan to attend tonight's meeting? Tell us in the comments.

Connor Valone

11:55 am on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Electric charging stations, reduced price parking downtown, carbon offsets, chicken ordinances, medical marijuana, and bike lanes. Why the heck is this sitting in city hall before my list? You know, the list that residents need and desire. $500,000 is such a waste. If senior citizens nearly slash the bond, how is this going to go over?

Reply

Amanda Sierra

5:03 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

This is really ridiculous. I mean people of Royal Oak pay extra on water (we have a corner lot so the rate goes up).
I can only imagine how much that rate would go up for a water play area. Not only that but there isn't enough parking for people during the summer to hang out at this park. It would be so much worse when crowding for this thing.

Reply

Stefan

1:17 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Did you Debbie Downers even bother to read the article? It would be funded through grants, sponsorships, and private donations, not tax money. The city gets a fixed rate from SOCWA, a medium-sized water park would not be enough to cause an increase in your water bill. This has been at the top of the list of requested recreational items for years, and will be great for families. Why would you list a series of items that have nothing to do with a water park? And there are already two senior centers, what else do you want? Better Meals on Wheels dinners? Matlock Appreciation Day?

Reply

Connor Valone

9:44 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Stefan, I listed things that have been before the commission before this and have been shoved aside for things developed pre-2008.

Reply

Stefan

3:04 pm on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

That still doesn't make any sense. Four out of the six items listed were considered by Ferndale, not Royal Oak. And electric charging stations were turned down by the DDA.

Reply

Leave a comment