Is the Gran Fondo dead?
Last month cycling promoter Dale Hughes, working with the Woodward Avenue Action Association, proposed holding a Gran Fondo, or "big ride," in a long loop along Woodward avenue from Detroit to Pontiac and back on Sunday, June 30th. The event would have included a race for professional cyclists followed by a public bicycle ride.
Many other cities around the world hold Gran Fondos. They are often marquee events which draw many thousands of participants. This Gran Fondo, running the same route as the historic Dream Cruise, would have attracted enormous attention and could have grown to become one of the world's premier cycling events.
Unfortunately, smack in the middle of the Gran Fondo, like a cranky old white guy yelling "get off my lawn!", lies Royal Oak. And Royal Oak, true to its long history of anti-bicycle, anti-pedestrian public policy, killed the Gran Fondo.
Community cycling events like the Gran Fondo are not just fun celebrations. They also introduce the idea of biking into thousands of minds, in the same way that the Dream Cruise spurs classic car fix-em-ups. The consultants who produced Royal Oak's non-motorized plan last year explicitly noted the importance of community cycling events and called on Royal Oak to organize and encourage them.
So why did Royal Oak kill the Gran Fondo?
Again, Royal Oak has a long history of ignoring the needs of persons who bike and walk. The current atrocious state of our streets, which has scared much of the population away from walking and biking, was no accident. Engineers and planners deliberately created streets and intersections to move the maximum number of cars as fast as possible; bikes and pedestrians are seen as obstacles to the smooth flow of traffic.
To be fair, Royal Oak is a typical American city in this regard. Exceptional cities, with exceptional staff and exceptional elected officials, have bucked this trend. Here in Michigan Ann Arbor and Traverse City have thousands of people biking and walking along streets that have been deliberately re-engineered to encourage biking and walking. Exceptional cities have discovered: if you build it, they will ride.
Stick-in-the-mud, cranky-old-white-guy cities like Royal Oak find excuses. The excuse to kill the Gran Fondo was "safety." Royal Oak's city manager authored a polemic condemning the Gran Fondo as a "recipe for disaster, " filled with apocalyptic rhetoric and predictions of violent death. The city manager was so desperate to find reasons to condemn the Gran Fondo he even cited churches--apparently the few hundred people who attend Sunday service at Shrine and St. John's would been so flummoxed by the Gran Fondo that only mass carnage or the collapse of Christianity could have resulted.
Rhetoric like this poisons the well. It is unlikely, but someone could get hurt or killed at a Gran Fondo. When our city manager publicly condemned the event as homicidal it become impossible for the event organizers to proceed, even though they had already won support and cooperation from Detroit, MDOT, and various other government bodies.
Would a Gran Fondo really be dangerous? Well, groups of cyclists hold rides on Woodward quite often. I've never heard of anyone being killed. Of course it could happen. People on bikes get struck and killed all the time. But large groups of riders, even on Woodward, are pretty safe, due to their high visibility. The city manager's memo killing the Gran Fondo ignored this basic and well-known fact.
And if safety is your bugaboo, consider events like Dream Cruise, Arts Beats and Eats, or even a typical weekend in downtown Royal Oak, with the mix of alcohol, cars, testosterone, and open-carry buffoons. Sooner or later someone is going to get killed--but when you want to do something you find reasons to say "yes." When you view cyclists and pedestrians as obstacles to the smooth flow of traffic you find reasons to say "no."
Royal Oak needs a kick in the pants.
On Monday, January 28th there are two things you can do to help apply the kick.
First, join us at the Royal Oak city commission meeting, and let the city commission know that you expect them to deliver on the promise of the non-motorized plan. We want a town where people feel safe riding a bike. Let them know how disappointed you are that they allowed their city manager to kill the Gran Fondo.
Then, immediately following public comment, we will retire to a downtown restaurant and plan a "big ride." The Gran Fondo may be dead, but the event promoters are determined to hold a public bicycle ride down Woodward Avenue on Sunday, June 30th, the day the Gran Fondo would have occurred. The Gran Fondo needed cooperation from city governments, but a public ride down Woodward is perfectly legal and requires no Royal Oak approval. Join us Monday, January 28th immediately after the public comment portion of the city commission meeting and help plan this event.
The Royal Oak city commission meeting will be held Monday, January 28th, 7:30 pm at Royal Oak City Hall, 211 Williams Street Royal Oak, MI 48067. That is in downtown Royal Oak immediately south of the library.
Yes, the Gran Fondo is dead. Long live the big ride!
Todd Scott
4:37 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
I share your frustration, Tom. The city lacks the leadership to compete with the cities that are committed to better biking and walking.
Mark Richardson
5:13 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
It seems as if the city dismissed the idea of the Gran Fondo without bothering to investigate whether safety concerns were legitimate or not. Royal Oak deserves better than that. Royal Oak residents should turn out in force at the council meeting to voice their disapproval of this hasty, unimaginative, and counterproductive decision.
Dale Hughes
5:20 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
I'm looking forward to a enjoyable ride on Woodward Ave on sunday june 30th! Get more information this spring at any of the bike shops along the Woodward Ave. Hope u will join me!
Joseph
7:27 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The city manager makes recommendations to the mayor and city commission. The city manager doesn't have a vote. The city commission could have rejected the city manager's recommendation. The mayor and city commission killed Gran Fondo.
Debbie Campbell
10:51 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013
If it had been called "FONDO FONDO" and involved straight shots of alcohol at Farmers Market it would have been no problem-
Adam
12:48 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Ain't that the truth. Here we are trying to promote health and recreation, and we get turned down by the city. If we would have included booze in some fashion, the city would have blessed this proposal in a minute.
The city turned down Gran Fondo, a bike ride, but embraces Vodka Vodka at the farmers market. What's next Heroin Heroin?
Tom Regan
8:24 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
@Joseph--you are correct of course, the commission is the sovereign power. In this case the city manager was way out in front. His memo blasting the Gran Fondo came as a recommendation to the commission on how to reply to the request by the Gran Fondo organizers for an endorsement; he suggested that instead of an endorsement, the city pass a resolution condemning it. He also began lobbying city staff and the staff of other cities to oppose it. He was incredibly effective and strangled the thing in its cradle. Of course it would have been great to see elected officials stand up to it, but political courage is about as common as virtue in a brothel.
48073
2:41 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Tom, I agree with your assessment, but what really infuriates me is that a majority of the city commision routinely ignores the city administration and police chief's recommendations to deny additional liquor licenses, for example, but they weren't willing to do that on a bike ride.
The commissioners have the political wherewithall when it comes to growing the local alcohol industry, but not expanding and promoting recreation and health. How sad and infuriating!
Bob of RO
9:44 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
"Rhetoric like this poisons the well."
Isn't that damn ironic. You could say that about everything written by this guy in his blogs and online post. The poke people in the eye style is not a long term solution.
Mark Itall
3:43 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Mr. Regan is a fountain of well-meaning energy, but you are correct Bob, in that his methodology is always similar to tossing grenades in the door and then trying to have a conversation. He has never understood that and at this point, never will. It is a shame as it severely limits his effectiveness with those who are not as committed to whatever as he is.
Bike 4 Life
9:49 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Mark Itall, you seem hypersensitive to any criticism of city hall and the city commission. Makes me wonder if you're a city commissioner.
Instead of focusing on why the city and city commission rebuffed this proposal, you react aggressively towards a person who attempted to forward a health and recreation proposal that not only benefitted the city of Royal Oak and the region.
Tell me again, why you needed to criticize Mr. Regan, and not focus your comments on why the city manager, the mayor, and city commission tanked this proposal.
Ronald Wolf
5:15 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
And you say I am wordy Mark? Anyway, this whole situation smells like yesterday's trash. These morons even tried to kick senior tricycles and bikes with baby carriers off the sidewalks into downtown traffic.
Royal Oak needs a mayor that will stand up to his city manager, or the other way around. As for the attorneys who advised no because of legal risks, shame on them.
If this city was so safety conscious it would do something about the rubber peeling hoopdies and wheely popping rocketbikes on Main Street. I understand your frustration.
Ken Oliver
2:08 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
How in the world is it Mr. Regan's fault that the city didn't approve this bike event?
Bob of RO
3:50 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Who said it was the fault of Mr. Regan, Ken? Seems like wild extrapolation with that comment.
Mark Itall
5:12 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Bike, No I am not and I really don't care one way or another if it got approved or denied. If not, oh well. Fine if it was approved. Simply noting that Bob is correct.
CWH
10:14 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013
I'm joining my husband Dale and, I hope, several thousand of my good friends for a bike ride on Sunday, June 30, 2013. It will be a great ride, perfectly legal and entirely safe. Bicyclists do not need anyone's permission to ride on the road.
Mark Itall
5:19 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Quite right. Hope everyone does it in a safe manner, staying to the right. And that vehicle drivers behave, too.
Ronald Wolf
4:49 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I blame Don Johnson, our cmmission attornies, and our metaphorically dead in the water mayor for this pitiful situation. From what I hear it was not just Royal Oak that put the kabash on this green event.
My opinion is that if it had the backing of ANY of the big three it would have made it. Money talks, but have you noticed not ONE car company has come up with a vehicle equipped with an optional built in bicycle rack on any of its vehicles.
Reminds me of how Henry and company killed the trolleys and trains. Its enough to make one go out and buy anything foreign that will help bail out the planet. How unpatriotic of me. If it were up to me I would like to see bicycles lead the dream cruise, after all they predated cars and the first car Ford built was actually a motorized quatrocycle.
Mark Itall
5:16 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
GM killed the trolleys with their buses, not Henry and Company.
Erich Von Zipper
3:05 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Tom Regan whining like a crabby old white guy when he doesn't get his way. Funny stuff.
Ronald Wolf
9:42 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Zipper, if you want to see the SNL of crabby old white guys watch a RO commission meeting, especially the part where our mayor decides who is going to get the honor of using public comment next. Watch his hand move back and forth. Reminds me of how players are picked just before a kids sandlot game.
Ronald Wolf
9:30 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Mark, I stand corrected. What would I do without you?
Mark Itall
10:07 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013
Don't know, but it helps your positions if you have the facts correct.
Ronald Wolf
3:00 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Almost everyone knows the sad story, in defense I mean't "and company" to refer to General Motors who had big plans for its busses. Ironically the last trolley tracks covered with asphalt were removed as scrap from Pontiac about ten years ago. I did not want to distract from the fact that Ford's first "car" was a motorized four wheel bicycle. By the way there would be an interest in antique restored bicycles found throughout the country, and Royal Oak. as well as modern foot powered designs out of a science fiction movie.
Ronald Wolf
2:53 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013
Last thought: Dennis Hopper is gone, but maybe we can get Peter Fonda, Johnny Depp, and Mickey Rourke to remake "Easy Rider" in Royal Oak updated by using ten speed bicycles instead of motorcycles to demonstrate the 60's generational conflict between the long hairs and the short hairs of the original movie to today's conflict between green bicycle riders and self proclaimed car guys such as our "Oakie" mayor and "boss hog" city manager. Ending, they never made it to Ferndale.
Someone call Quentin Tarretino.