.

Students React to Charges Against Royal Oak High School Principal

Michael Greening faces embezzlement charges. With his pre-exam conference scheduled for Friday, community may finally begin to get some answers.

Students and former students reacted to the news of  Principal Michael Greening’s arraignment on felony embezzlement charges Friday with a mixture of disappointment and hope that this “mess” is some sort of misunderstanding.

Greening stood mute in as a plea of not guilty was entered on his behalf , each carrying a maximum five-year penalty and/or fines.

“This whole thing is a mess,” said Senior Class President Dan Dobras, who like many students is worried for the embattled principal and his family. Greening, a longtime Royal Oak resident, has two daughters at Royal Oak High School.

.

It has been more than three months since Superintendent Shawn Lewis-Lakin sent a letter to the school's roughly 1,500 students and their families saying "due to the possibility of financial irregularities in student activities funds."  Since that time little information has been released by the school district or Royal Oak Police. Even Greening’s attorney, Paul Stablein, appeared to be in the dark about the allegations against his client.

“In regards to the specifics, I don’t know what it is yet. I am not privy to what the investigation has entailed,” Stablein said outside the 44th District courtroom on Friday.

Student reaction

“Students are all civilized and we have opinions,” Dobras said.

But it’s hard to establish any point of view when so little is known, he said. Students received a letter in December and then there was Friday’s arraignment.

“There is no middle to the story,” Dobras said. "Where is the middle?"

The situation has been handled poorly, said Randy Wade, a senior at the high school. When students came back from the winter holiday break in January, just days after learning Greening was placed on administrative leave, “the first few days were ridiculous,” according to Wade.

“Teachers were huddled in the hallways talking to each other,” he said. “No one knew what was going on.”

Wade expects more of the same today, as students and staff speculate and wait for answers as Greening’s case plays out in the court system. More information about the government’s case may be forthcoming Friday, when Greening is scheduled for a pre-exam conference.

Read more on the steps in a criminal case.

For now, all Wade can say with certainty is that he is disappointed Greening most likely will not be a part of his 2012 graduation ceremony.

Former ROHS student Bill LeAnnais plans to be in court Friday for the pre-exam conference to show his support for his one-time principal, whom he said he misses now that he is a college student. There is not the kind of one-on-one support from the top at the collegiate level that he was accustomed to getting from Greening, he said.

“I am sure this is some sort of misunderstanding – like an accounting mistake,” said LeAnnis, who graduated last year. “He has my 100 percent support.”

School district directs questions to police

Superintendent Lewis-Lakin is directing all questions regarding the police investigation and criminal charges to the and Oakland County Prosecutor's Office.

After the district initiated an investigation in December, the matter was turned over to the Royal Oak Police Department for a forensic audit. The process is in the hands of the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office, and Lewis-Lakin said he cannot comment other than to say the district is committed to a process that is "complete, thorough, impartial and fair."

Lt. Tom Goad of the Royal Oak Oak Police issued a news release Friday with the charges against Greening, and had no further comment.

tim klemet April 25, 2012 at 10:36 AM
I am a big supporter of Mr. Greening, that said, I find myself agreeing with John Doe. He is the only one that is making any sence in all these posts. I hope and pray Mr. Greening had nothing to do with the missing money, but at this point, it's NOT looking very good.
Bill April 26, 2012 at 04:40 AM
Mr. Doe - You mistake my comments as being blindly supportive of the individual, when in fact I am supportive of the process (within reason). Regardless of what has been said, what evidence has been produced and what charges have been brought - the guy deserves his day in court and to present his side of the story. Out of respect for his children, I think restraint is in order. As for my slander comment - hello - a little sarcasm there... I just threw that in there for the fun of it.
Sue Sandtveit April 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Poznick's case was NOT swept under the rug. There was little oversight back-in-the-day. The district's entire sports accounting procedure was revamped after Poznick resigned.
Drake Smarch April 27, 2012 at 03:38 PM
BOOM! way to go randy! so much more respect. :)
Debra Ball May 31, 2012 at 02:34 AM
I do not know personally know Mr. Greening nor any of the Board members. I do trust our court system and I am willing to wait for the results. I am aware of similar cases, however, in which a trusted person, deeply loved by their community, was later found guilty of financial misconduct. It does happen. I attended a church which became deeply divided when the minister was accused of embezzlement. When it turned out that he was guilty, and was fired, there were still people insisting that he was 'set up' and that he was a wonderful guy. So even a legal verdict won't necessarily change people's minds.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »