.
Feedback

In Brief: Human Rights Ordinance Passes, City OKs Suicide Prevention Task Force and More

Commission handles long agenda in Monday night meeting.

The Royal Oak City Commission took three hours to work through a long agenda at Monday night’s regular meeting.

Royal Oak passes human rights ordinance

Royal Oak became the 22nd Michigan community to pass a human rights law, joining Ann Arbor, Birmingham, Detroit, East Lansing, Ferndale, Traverse City and others.

After listening to nearly two dozen speakers during public comment, the commission voted 6-1 to approve a human rights ordinance. It will take affect on March 14.

It was just "happenstance" that Ryan Plecha, whose house was damaged by Wednesday's explosion on Cooper Avenue, participated in public comment. He came solely for an update on the explosion, he said.

"I moved to Royal Oak because it seemed to be the right place, but I am now convinced it is the right place to be. The neighbors that helped, the police that helped, the fire that helped (after the explosion)—I can’t imagine living in any other city right now," Plecha said.

The Cooper Avenue resident said he could not fathom a scenario where last week's heroes would have questioned a person's sexual identity before offering assistance.

"Would they have not helped that person?  It’s essentially the same thing before you. Someone can’t lose their job and their home for that same reason," Plecha said, adding, "I want to live in Royal Oak, but if this doesn’t pass, how can I want to live in a city that I know is going to discriminate? That’s not Royal Oak. That’s not 2013."

While the majority of people who stepped up to the podium were in favor of a human rights ordinance, there were a few people who were skeptical, calling the ordinance's language "too broad." 

Commissioner David Poulton was Monday's lone dissenter. He indicated that the city has proven it is "tolerant" and preferred the matter be put before voters. 

Suicide Prevention Task Force

Commissioners voted to create a sub-committee, led by Commissioners Peggy Goodwin, Dave Pouton and Patricia Capello, to research a suicide prevention task force as recommended by Royal Oak Police Chief Corrigan O’Donohue.

Commissioners asked O'Donohue to look into a comprehensive suicide prevention initiative in February after a string of tragedies at a Woodward Avenue shooting range.

In the past six months, two people have committed suicide, and a third person attempted suicide, at Target Sports, a Royal Oak shooting range and gun shop.

Ethics Ordinance

Commissioners voted unanimously to direct City Attorney Dave Gillam to craft a new ethics ordinance based on recommendations offered by the Rules Committee, which consists of Mayor Jim Ellison and Commissioners Dave Poulton and Jim Rasor.

Ellison called the Rules Committee's review of ethics "emotional."

"There I was sitting with two lawyers on either side," Ellison said. "My challenge to (Rasor and Poulton) was to write some verbiage that a non-lawyer like me could understand."

Though the discussions were heated, Ellison said when he asked Rasor and Poulton if they could "live with" the final document, they both said "yes." 

See the attached PDF for the Rules Committee recommendations.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Royal Oak Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Brendan March 5, 2013 at 09:30 pm
Although, I am supportive of a human rights ordinance, I think the bigger concern is that an elected body brazenly ignores the vote of the people.
Let me ask a question. When is it O.K. for the city commission to ignore a vote of the people, and when is it not O.K.? See the slippery slope? In my humble opinion, the city commission shouldn't have that discretion.
RO Kelly March 5, 2013 at 10:50 pm
I agree with the above poster. If both Capello and Poulton both preffered that this ordinance go before the voters, why didn't they make the motion (and second) to put it on the ballot?
RO Kelly March 5, 2013 at 10:54 pm
No one claimed that the public's sentiment has stayed static. But, instead of guessing where public sentiment is on the issue, the only way to prove that it has changed in favor of a human rights ordinance is to measure the support via referendum.
Ronald Wolf March 6, 2013 at 01:09 am
The above comments are the sad reason that our commission, so often a day late and a dollar short had to act unilaterally on this issue. I am sure former Coughlinites and other bible thumpers on the right would like to ignore the growing need for equal rights in the LGBT community as demonstrated by past abuses that literally came to a head in the infamous "Stonewall rebellion in NYC" as well as in gay hate crimes, such as a horrendous beating of two transgenders in Pontiac leaving the Liberty Bar just to bring it closer to home. This commission that too often places their ability to "get along" with each other as more important than ethics may be the reason I may not vote for our mayor again, and a though I beleve he is considering a well deserved retirement, I believe like a stopped clock is right twice a day he did the right thing last night. As far as priorities this city like many others is in "Wonderland",
Citizens are not showing up to commission meetings in the numbers that make a difference so don't blame the commissioners for making their own jobs as easy as possitlble.
V March 6, 2013 at 02:46 am
Great to hear. And good for Royal Oak!
Bill March 6, 2013 at 03:24 am
So Ron, you're good with the mayor and city commission picking and choosing when to honor the vote of the residents?
Are you also good when they pick and choose what portions of the city charter to follow? And master plan?
JimJim March 6, 2013 at 03:25 am
Why have a city commission? Just stuff everything on the ballot!
Judy Davids (Editor) March 6, 2013 at 04:32 am
Thank you WROK for sharing a video of Monday night's discussion on this agenda item.
Bob March 6, 2013 at 01:29 pm
Oh look, a picture of Rasor. One hand in the cookie jar. The other hand promoting human rights. Which hand has the greater impact?
I say the hand in the cookie jar as this ordinance seems more ceremonial.
The Duke of Royal Oak March 6, 2013 at 02:42 pm
"THUS, THE CONTROVERSY ABOUT THE MORAL MAJORITY ARISES NOT ONLY FROM IT'S VIEWS, BUT FROM IT'S NAME WHICH, IN THE MINDS OF MANY, SEEMS TO IMPLY THAT ONLY ONE SET OF PUBLIC POLICIES IS MORAL AND ONLY ONE MAJORITY CAN POSSIBLY BE RIGHT." Senator Edward Kennedy
TomBanks March 6, 2013 at 03:19 pm
perhaps Deranged Anti-Rasor Disorder should have been included in the new DSM-V.
TomBanks March 6, 2013 at 03:23 pm
Kelly:
Why don't we just stuff everything on the ballot? Maybe we should put the Thirteenth Amendment up for a vote. T
mary rose March 6, 2013 at 04:18 pm
Duke, the majority was the 8000+ citizens who voted against an ordinance like this in 2001.
Do you not respect the will of your neighbors?
Bob March 6, 2013 at 04:18 pm
Deranged, 1921 and 13th Amendment are quite the charges. Did you just sign up for this one issue and to hurl insults at people TomBanks? Enjoy your troll.
R.O. March 6, 2013 at 05:19 pm
In a democracy, it's kinda scarey when the politicians pick and choose when to follow the results of a referendum of the people.
So, we're supposed to act like the vote in 2001 never happened? Scarey!
The Duke of Royal Oak March 6, 2013 at 05:32 pm
mary rose, Because a majority agrees on an issue does not make it right! Dear, do not forget the "womans sufrage", the "civil rights movement", "slavery" all which were issues that the MAJORITY went along with and under the banner of the faithful Christianity community. Discrimination is discrimination no matter how you may justify it.
The Duke of Royal Oak March 6, 2013 at 05:40 pm
mary rose, Assuming that you are female, it is utterly SHOCKING that any woman that knows the struggles that females encountered can then discriminate against others! ( Females were once considered to be property, and not that long ago!) It is important that one learns and knows history.
Ronald Wolf March 6, 2013 at 05:46 pm
Bill, doing the right thing sometimes takes leadership. To my knowledge there is no prohibition in our charter to extend civil rights now the law in every state to any group that may hold views or lifestyles different than yours. Let me take the freedom of worship which is almost worldwide not as protected as it is in this country.
Now to extend that right to sex offenders, that is another story. They are predators not consulting adults. To compare homosexuals to sexual predators that might be either straight or gay is an insult and analogous to religious discrimination, Ethics are another can of worms, unlike what our mayor said it cannot involve give and take, one must draw the line. I am greatly disappointed in Pat Capello whom I believe is going out of her way to retrieve her standing in our mayor's eyes at our expense. If attorneys are going to get an indulgence regarding this ordinance I strongly recommend that voters if they do not want to minimize interest conflicts should not vote any more attorneys onto the commission. We need only one attorney, the city attorney, anymore leads to headaches.
Ronald Wolf March 6, 2013 at 05:56 pm
wooops correction: "I strongly recommend that voters if they WANT to minimize interest conflicts they should not vote anymore attorneys onto the commission."
By the way Bill, if you are Bill Shaw, thankyou for doing the scutwork on the problem of the police and fire concessions not being implemented as yet. Frankly its the potential abuse of overtime that benefits downtown bars, AB&E much more than residents that is the larger issue.
Ronald Wolf March 6, 2013 at 06:21 pm
I agree with Edward Kennedy, we do not need a moral police to tell us what is right or wrong between adults in the privacy of our bedrooms. That is the gist of this right?
Its ironic but "Sharia" law which violates the rights of women and children with impunity based on the lifestyle of their prophet IS considered the moral majority in the fundamentalist Moslem world that outnumbers us. Add that us Christians and Jews have a checkered history in that department (stoning-stake burning) which has since been tempered and corrected with mercy, and is still in that process.
Frank March 6, 2013 at 06:34 pm
Yup, that is who I want telling me about morals. The late great boozer, sexual predator and murderer, teddy the great.
The Duke of Royal Oak March 6, 2013 at 07:40 pm
Frank, Senator Edward Kennedy did some wonderful things in his position and lifetime, especially for the down trotted. How easy it is for one to criticize! To the dungeon Frank!
The Duke of Royal Oak March 6, 2013 at 07:41 pm
Your also off subject Frank!
Bob March 7, 2013 at 01:57 pm
R.I.P. Mary Jo
The Duke of Royal Oak March 7, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Perhaps one should concern themselves with the over 50% divorce rate, pre marital sex, infidelity. Before the American Family Association of Michigan judges others, they should clean their own houses and souls!
The Duke of Royal Oak March 7, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Go look for a birth certificates with your RADICAL EXTREMIST RIGHT.
The Duke of Royal Oak March 7, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Thank God President Lincoln did not listen to the "ENTIRE COMMUNITY."
Frank March 7, 2013 at 04:04 pm
Dukie, I was responding to the fact that anyone would use Ted Kennedy as their moral arbiter of anything. So I was on subject. Also, it is downtrodden.
Judy Davids (Editor) March 7, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Let's remember to keep our comments about the subject and not each other. Thanks.
Judy Davids (Editor) March 7, 2013 at 04:54 pm
This comment stream is now closed. Thank you for your input.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Judy Davids (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 11:26 am
I took Michelle's couch to 5K class. It was awesome. More than 40 runners competed in their first 5KRead More race Sunday in Royal Oak. Woot!